Yes, but what I would say on that subject is that these measures are focused on a particular type of transaction, which is the sale of a business and the sale of its assets. In the context of those sales, what was occurring, for example, was that the vendor would agree not to compete with the buyer's business and would take value.
I think what you're referring to is a broader issue with respect to transactions related to copyright and transfer pricing. Copyright is actual property, under the law, whereas a restrictive covenant was found by the Federal Court of Appeal not to be property.
With respect to transfer pricing, these measures are not about it. That would be a different issue, and I'd have to turn back to Mr. Cook.