I have a business right now that has 10,000 customers a month and a tremendous amount of cash transactions, as well as opportunities to use some of the new and innovative techniques around the world. Frankly, I think Canada lags behind Australia and the U.K. tremendously in relation to opportunities that are available here. I certainly think that it would help our economy to have something implemented that would look at other studies that have been done in other jurisdictions and at what those jurisdictions have done.
Again, I'm asking a question to Ms. Nash in this particular case, because of course she's a mover of this motion. That is, you refer to the social impacts of high household debt levels, and I'm just curious to know if you've looked at other jurisdictions. We know that the United States, for instance, has this issue, as most of Europe does and as some of the other western economies do.
Has there been any attention spent on what's happening in other jurisdictions and have there been any proposals to move this particular motion more in the direction that other jurisdictions have looked at and have been successful in? Because, simply put, Mr. Rankin referred to other jurisdictions, and one of his comments was that, well, if other jurisdictions are doing it, we should do it too, which quite frankly, in my mind, is not a very good argument. That's one of the reasons I voted against it.
I'm wondering if Ms. Nash could take just a minute and explain to us what other jurisdictions are doing related to this particular—