Mr. Trueman, you've indicated that Canada has the lowest meter rate. I saw a certain satisfaction in that, and I don't take issue with that at all. But I think a layperson would view that as something like a taxi meter. If you've got the lowest meter in town, it means the taxi driver is getting the lowest income in town as well. It's not just all on the positive side.
Yes, in terms of competitiveness and the argument that would go back and forth here on that, it's pretty clear where the government would come down on that. But I'm very curious about that lower meter rate. What is the fiscal impact of the lower meter rate on the government's ability to provide the services and programs Canadians are asking for? Would it not make some sense to perhaps be in the middle of that group, as opposed to being the absolute lowest?