Yes, certainly. Thank you.
I should also say that we're in favour of all of the initiatives that would actually stimulate donations, but when I say that real estate would have a more positive impact, I look at some of the patterns and the history we've had, and I see that a lot of our donors might have second properties—cabins, recreational property—so removing the exemption there is consistent with what they've already told us in terms of their legacies and what they want to give.
I think the earlier material you heard is actually quite important, because we're thinking essentially of residential properties. There would need to be some caveats and some restrictions around making sure that what we wouldn't lose are of course valuable ecological pieces of property, which would then be developed. You would have to build in there some restrictions on that.