Mr. Hoback, please.
Evidence of meeting #61 for Finance in the 41st Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was transfer.
A recording is available from Parliament.
Evidence of meeting #61 for Finance in the 41st Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was transfer.
A recording is available from Parliament.
Conservative
Randy Hoback Conservative Prince Albert, SK
Thank you, Chair.
I have just a quick question. For a port of entry, if all of a sudden there was a fire at that facility and you had to relocate to a mobile facility or something, it would allow for that, correct?
Then, for example, you have the American customs basically looking at each other. If you had a situation like a flood, would you coordinate with American customs officials, to try to find a common area to move to so that you're both across from each other still?
Manager, Preclearance, Canada Border Services Agency, Department of Public Safety
It's kind of interesting, because once we…. If we could relocate to the U.S.--is that the question?
Manager, Preclearance, Canada Border Services Agency, Department of Public Safety
We would love to be able to do that. We don't have a means or an agreement to do that yet. In fact, that's what we are working on right now as part of the Beyond the Border action plan, the security and prosperity partnership. Negotiations will begin shortly with the United States so that we're able to do that at some point and establish a pre-clearance facility one day in the U.S.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative James Rajotte
Thank you.
I think that's all the questions, Mr. Lalonde. Thank you so much for staying with us until near the bitter end here. We appreciate your time. Thank you so much.
Manager, Preclearance, Canada Border Services Agency, Department of Public Safety
The last person standing is either good or bad.
Manager, Preclearance, Canada Border Services Agency, Department of Public Safety
Thank you.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative James Rajotte
We will bring in division 30, the Pension Benefits Standards Act, 1985, and we'll have Ms. Hemmings back before the committee.
Welcome back to the committee, Ms. Hemmings. Thank you for staying so late as well. We sincerely appreciate that and look forward to your giving us a brief overview of this change.
Lynn Hemmings Senior Chief, Payments, Payments and Pensions, Financial Sector Policy Branch, Department of Finance
Thank you very much.
This amendment stems from correspondence we received from the Standing Joint Committee for the Scrutiny of Regulations regarding their concern that the Air Canada pension plan solvency deficiency funding regulations and the Air Canada pension plan funding regulations, 2009, were made without proper statutory authority.
Subsections 39(2) and 39(3) of the Pension Benefits Standards Act allow regulations made under the act to apply generally to all pension plans or specifically to one or more pension plans, or to one or more classes of pension plans. These authorities came into force in 2010. Essentially, this amendment deems those two subsections of the Pension Benefits Standards Act to come into force prior to the making of the Air Canada regulations, thereby ensuring the validity of both those regulations.
I'd be happy to answer any questions.
Conservative
NDP
Wayne Marston NDP Hamilton East—Stoney Creek, ON
I just want to be clear in what I'm hearing. You say the whole idea of this is to retroactively insert a law in where the courts or someone has suggested that it was not appropriate to do it?
Senior Chief, Payments, Payments and Pensions, Financial Sector Policy Branch, Department of Finance
No. It's to essentially ensure that there is statutory authority for those regulations. Those regulations are in force, and Air Canada has used the first set of regulations and is using the second set, so this essentially is just ensuring that there is proper statutory authority for those regulations.
Senior Chief, Payments, Payments and Pensions, Financial Sector Policy Branch, Department of Finance
That is correct.
NDP
Wayne Marston NDP Hamilton East—Stoney Creek, ON
Which, the way I'm hearing it, implies at least that the authority wasn't there at the time the provisions were put in place.
Senior Chief, Payments, Payments and Pensions, Financial Sector Policy Branch, Department of Finance
It's the scrutiny of regulations committee that is essentially making a housekeeping amendment to—
Wayne Marston NDP Hamilton East—Stoney Creek, ON
Okay. That was my next question. What prompted this?
Senior Chief, Payments, Payments and Pensions, Financial Sector Policy Branch, Department of Finance
It was prompted by the Standing Joint Committee on the Scrutiny of Regulations.
NDP
Wayne Marston NDP Hamilton East—Stoney Creek, ON
So it wasn't an outside source that caused it. It was internal housekeeping, then.
Senior Chief, Payments, Payments and Pensions, Financial Sector Policy Branch, Department of Finance
No. In reviewing regulations, they decided that it would be prudent to make this kind of amendment to the PBSA.
Senior Chief, Payments, Payments and Pensions, Financial Sector Policy Branch, Department of Finance
You're welcome.