Okay.
Mr. Houston, you mentioned that we should lift the prohibition on limited partnerships as investments. Now, the theory behind limiting charities is to ensure that charities are concerned with charitable purposes, and achieving those objectives, and not concerning themselves with investments and business-type arrangements, so that their investments should be in something solid and hard, that can't change, that they don't have to think about.
Wouldn't moving in the direction you're suggesting pose some unique problems for charities and for those who give with the expectation that they will only be investing in very safe and sound investments while they're concentrating on the things that they're supposed to do?