I agree, and that is exactly what the U.S. does in relation to a lot of their trade laws with other states, just because of the protectionism of the sixties and seventies.
I was more interested in your final comments regarding the Nexen deal, in particular. I was wondering if the chamber sees a difference between a corporation that invests in the oil sands, for instance, or in conventional oil in Canada, that is a market economy investment or is owned by foreigners—that is, foreigners or Americans investing in particular oil sands companies—and companies owned by states that maybe are questionable with respect to their human rights records and the rule of law.