Well, the immediate asymmetry and ongoing sort of quest for symmetry is something that can be the subject of comment, and people could think or suggest that Canada ought to have sought immediate symmetry or reciprocity or equivalence and not agreed to it without having done so. I would say what we've done on that basis is the same platform as the other 29 countries or jurisdictions that have agreed to it.
To respond more directly to the question, I don't understand it as a legal question. I think we can provide benefits to another country and they could provide different benefits to us. I don't think the fact that the suite, if you will, is different makes it an illegal agreement. That, I just don't understand.