Certainly.
What we're looking at is the fact that, yes, there was no obligation on the government to follow the court's judgment, because the court's judgment was in fact for a specific client base, the SISIP clients. So that had to do with the new Veterans Charter and insurance under SISIP.
The government of the time actually decided to look at the possibility. In fact it stopped all clawbacks from Veterans Affairs Canada payments, and at the same time it looked at retroactivity. You can see that the population affected here is more than just the new veterans clients. We're talking about the war veterans allowance clients as well. So we're talking about going back 40 or 50 years.
With regard to fairness, we think the government acted fairly. Going forward we would rather see money spent on people who would be destitute at 65 rather than on having people who are now well off get more retroactively.