Evidence of meeting #39 for Finance in the 41st Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site.) The winning word was amendment.

A video is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Brian Ernewein  General Director, Tax Policy Branch, Department of Finance
Ted Cook  Senior Legislative Chief, Tax Legislation Division, Tax Policy Branch, Department of Finance
Bernard Butler  Director General, Policy Division, Policy, Communications and Commemoration Branch, Department of Veterans Affairs
Suzy McDonald  Director General, Workplace Hazardous Materials Directorate, Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch, Department of Health
Jason Wood  Director, Policy and Program Development, Workplace Hazardous Materials Directorate, Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch, Department of Health
Brian McCauley  Assistant Commissioner, Canada Revenue Agency
Denise Frenette  Vice-President, Finance and Corporate Services, Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency
Soren Halverson  Senior Chief, Corporate Finance and Asset Management, Department of Finance
Wayne Foster  Director, Securities Policies, Department of Finance
James Wu  Chief, Financial Institutions Analysis, Department of Finance
Donald Roussel  Acting Associate Assistant Deputy Minister, Safety and Security, Department of Transport
Kash Ram  Director General, Road Safety and Motor Vehicle Regulation, Department of Transport
Michel Leclerc  Director, Regulatory Affairs Coordination, Department of Transport
Colin Spencer James  Director, Policy and Program Design, Temporary Foreign Workers, Skills and Employment Branch, Department of Employment and Social Development
Darlene Carreau  Chairperson, Trade-marks Opposition Board, Department of Industry
Nathalie Martel  Director, Old Age Security Policy, Income Security and Social Development Branch, Department of Employment and Social Development
Thao Pham  Assistant Deputy Minister, Federal Montreal Bridges, Department of Transport
France Pégeot  Special Advisor to the Deputy Minister, Department of Justice
Ann Chaplin  Senior General Counsel, Department of Justice
Atiq Rahman  Director, Operational Policy and Research, Department of Employment and Social Development

9:45 p.m.

NDP

Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

In the next omnibus bill, just in case we get it wrong, we've got another omnibus coming in six months.

9:45 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative James Rajotte

I have one more question for the witness.

9:45 p.m.

NDP

Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

He was giving a Liberal response there.

9:45 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative James Rajotte

He hasn't had to answer a question in a while.

9:45 p.m.

Paul Halucha

There will be a regulatory process. Much of this needs to be implemented in regulation. CIPO will be taking steps to develop office policies on many of the practices, and we intend to fully engage with stakeholders on that process.

9:45 p.m.

NDP

Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

All right, thank you.

9:45 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative James Rajotte

Thank you.

Are there any further questions? Mr. McKay.

9:45 p.m.

Liberal

John McKay Liberal Scarborough—Guildwood, ON

Somebody here is blowing smoke, and I don't know who. I dare say my colleagues across the way have no idea, but they've got their voting sheets and they're supposed to do what they're supposed to do.

Who benefits from these proposals?

9:45 p.m.

Paul Halucha

Canadian businesses benefit, absolutely, for certain.

9:45 p.m.

Liberal

John McKay Liberal Scarborough—Guildwood, ON

Canadian businesses are saying they don't benefit. So, who benefits if they say they don't? Surely to goodness it's their right to say that they don't?

9:45 p.m.

Paul Halucha

I maintain that Canadian businesses will see benefits from this process.

9:45 p.m.

Liberal

John McKay Liberal Scarborough—Guildwood, ON

They will see?

9:45 p.m.

Paul Halucha

Absolutely.

9:45 p.m.

Liberal

John McKay Liberal Scarborough—Guildwood, ON

So Giant Tiger doesn't know what they're talking about and Pepsi doesn't know what it's talking about and Canadian Institute of Plumbing and Heating doesn't know what it's talking about. The CBA, ABA, and all the ones that Nathan mentioned as well don't know what they're talking about?

9:45 p.m.

Paul Halucha

Let me give you two examples. Right now, to do a trademark application the cost is roughly about $4,000. After this, the only fee that will remain will be the actual application process with CIPO, which is $450. A firm can do that now without having to go to.... They can go to a lawyer or they cannot go to a lawyer. If they make the decision that they don't want to, they can do that. That's a savings.

In the instances where companies are exporting, so they're seeking to protect their intellectual property in foreign markets, the maintenance of a package of trademarks will be significantly reduced. It's not me saying this, this is the International Trademark Association that said that a trademark owner wishing to register a mark in the U.S. plus 10 other countries is going to save more than 62% in total fees. So there are significant reductions—

9:45 p.m.

Liberal

John McKay Liberal Scarborough—Guildwood, ON

Mr. Halucha, I've been here 17 years and I don't think I've ever heard the Canadian Chamber of Commerce come to this committee or any other and say please tax me and keep my fees up there. It just stretches credulity. I think around 10 o'clock at night it's maybe stretching a few other things as well.

You make the claim that you're going to reduce the fees from $4,000 to $400, and these people are saying, don't change it, don't touch it. Why is it that you know better than they do and they're the ones who are going to be paying the fees?

9:45 p.m.

Paul Halucha

Again, I would point not to me.

I got this question at the Senate committee as well. My suggestion there was to look at what has happened in the other jurisdictions that have joined these protocols.

9:45 p.m.

Liberal

John McKay Liberal Scarborough—Guildwood, ON

I'm sure the Canadian Bar Association has looked at these other jurisdictions, and they've said they don't like it.

9:45 p.m.

Paul Halucha

In a number of these—

9:45 p.m.

Liberal

John McKay Liberal Scarborough—Guildwood, ON

You say you've had specific consultations. Well, the Canadian Bar Association says there haven't been any.

9:45 p.m.

Paul Halucha

Well, if you go to a—

9:45 p.m.

Liberal

John McKay Liberal Scarborough—Guildwood, ON

There's no distance between those two statements.

9:45 p.m.

Paul Halucha

If you look on CIPO's website, the consultation documents are all there.

9:45 p.m.

Liberal

John McKay Liberal Scarborough—Guildwood, ON

Was the Canadian Bar Association there?

9:45 p.m.

Chairperson, Trade-marks Opposition Board, Department of Industry

Darlene Carreau

I believe they did comment.

I can't remember what year it was, but you will find them in either the 2005 or the 2010 consultations.