I think what's tough is that there is no threshold date. With the aerodromes it's writ large. If this language was intended to deal with just the private aerodromes, we would like to see some language that constrained the airports that were captured by it.
We've had lawyers review the language in question. The response I got back from them is multiple pages. I don't want to testify to the legality of it. Really, we've taken it as a package. The language as it's crafted captures far more aerodromes than we understand to have been intended. It's raised enough concern with our members that they want us to go on the record and suggest that the language be changed.