The language is written pretty broadly. I don't have the text right here, but my recollection is that it doesn't actually get into differentiation or any sort of threshold, which I think is part of the concern. As I said, the intent, as we understand it, is to deal with private aerodromes, if, say, somebody wants to start an aerodrome and just starts building one. We understand that to be the intent of the changes to the regulation as they are proposed, but as the text is written currently, it's fairly broad, and that's our concern. It certainly would need to be further defined.
On November 17th, 2014. See this statement in context.