Evidence of meeting #82 for Finance in the 41st Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was tfsa.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Maureen Donnelly  Associate Professor, Taxation, Goodman School of Business, Brock University, As an Individual
Allister W. Young  Associate Professor, Taxation, Goodman School of Business, Brock University, As an Individual
Ron Bonnett  President, Canadian Federation of Agriculture
Angella MacEwen  Senior Economist, Social and Economic Policy, Canadian Labour Congress
David Podruzny  Vice-President, Business and Economics, Chemisty Industry Association of Canada, Canadian Manufacturing Council
Bruce MacDonald  President and Chief Executive Officer, Imagine Canada
Jean-Denis Fréchette  Parliamentary Budget Officer, Library of Parliament
Trevor McGowan  Senior Legislative Chief, Tax Legislation Division, Tax Policy Branch, Department of Finance
Miodrag Jovanovic  Director, Personal Income Tax, Tax Policy Branch, Department of Finance
Siobhan Hardy  Director General, Social Policy, Department of Employment and Social Development
Brad Recker  Senior Chief, Fiscal Policy Division, Economic and Fiscal Policy Branch, Department of Finance
Marc-Yves Bertin  Director General, International Assistance Envelope Management, Strategic Policy, Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade
Margaret Hill  Senior Director, Strategic Policy and Legislative Reform, Department of Employment and Social Development
David Charter  Senior Advisor, Strategic Policy, Department of Employment and Social Development
Charles-Philippe Rochon  Assistant Director, Labour Law Analysis, Department of Employment and Social Development
Mark Potter  Director General, Policing Policy Directorate, Law Enforcement and Policing Branch, Department of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness
Bayla Kolk  Assistant Deputy Minister, Pensions and Benefits Sector, Treasury Board Secretariat
Jennifer Champagne  Counsel, Treasury Board Secretariat
Carl Trottier  Associate Assistant Deputy Minister, Compensation and Labour Relations Sector, Treasury Board Secretariat
Caroline Fobes  Deputy Executive Director and General Counsel, Department of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness

10:15 a.m.

Miodrag Jovanovic Director, Personal Income Tax, Tax Policy Branch, Department of Finance

We've done a long-term analysis projection until 2035 that's with respect to long-term cost. In today's dollar, we assess that the enhancement would cost about $650 million. That is about—

10:15 a.m.

NDP

Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

Is that per year?

10:15 a.m.

Director, Personal Income Tax, Tax Policy Branch, Department of Finance

Miodrag Jovanovic

Yes. That's about 0.03% of GDP and 0.3% of tax revenues. With respect to the overall program, we've assessed that the long-term cost over the same horizon would be about 0.22% of GDP. With respect to the short term, or the cost over the planning horizon, you have that in the budget on page 440. It would go from $85 million in 2015-16 to $360 million in 2019-20, for a total of $1.135 billion.

10:20 a.m.

NDP

Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

The PBO has estimated that the program cost would roughly double in four years' time as measured as a share of the economy. Do you agree with that assessment from the Parliamentary Budget Officer?

10:20 a.m.

Director, Personal Income Tax, Tax Policy Branch, Department of Finance

Miodrag Jovanovic

As I said, our assessment is that by 2035 the cost would be 0.3% of tax revenues, about $650 million in current year dollars.

10:20 a.m.

NDP

Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

The federal department often uses quintiles to assess any tax measure and its impact on Canadians. Is that true?

10:20 a.m.

Director, Personal Income Tax, Tax Policy Branch, Department of Finance

Miodrag Jovanovic

They don't necessarily use quintiles. For instance, we can look at tax brackets, which are not necessarily tied to quintiles. As you know, 1% of Canadians, the wealthiest, earn above $200,000.

10:20 a.m.

NDP

Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

I'm wondering, just in terms of those income quintiles, the income brackets, which quintile will see the largest benefit, in absolute terms, from the doubling of the TFSA.

10:20 a.m.

Director, Personal Income Tax, Tax Policy Branch, Department of Finance

Miodrag Jovanovic

I'm sorry. I haven't done that analysis. I don't have the answer.

10:20 a.m.

NDP

Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

Has the department done that analysis?

10:20 a.m.

Director, Personal Income Tax, Tax Policy Branch, Department of Finance

Miodrag Jovanovic

Sorry, I mean the department hasn't done that analysis.

10:20 a.m.

NDP

Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

The department has not done that analysis.

The PBO has done that analysis and has estimated that the top quintile, the top 20% of Canadian earners, will gain approximately $9 billion from doubling the TFSA, which exceeds all other gains by all other groups of Canadian earners, so of the bottom 80%, I suppose, combined. Do you refute that evidence?

10:20 a.m.

Director, Personal Income Tax, Tax Policy Branch, Department of Finance

Miodrag Jovanovic

What I can tell you is that the individuals taxed in the third and fourth brackets in our tax system represent about 9% of the population, which is basically half of the top quintile. If you use the top quintile as a point of reference, you'd have many people, actually, taxed in the second bracket. I'm not sure what the top quintile, in that context, really means.

10:20 a.m.

NDP

Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

Has the department done any assessment of the impact on savings since the TFSA was first introduced in 2009?

10:20 a.m.

Director, Personal Income Tax, Tax Policy Branch, Department of Finance

Miodrag Jovanovic

When it was introduced in 2009, we said that the long-term impact of the TFSA would be about $3 billion in income.

10:20 a.m.

NDP

Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

Has the TFSA, since being introduced, increased the savings rate of Canadians?

10:20 a.m.

Director, Personal Income Tax, Tax Policy Branch, Department of Finance

Miodrag Jovanovic

We haven't done that analysis. The Department of Finance hasn't done that analysis.

10:20 a.m.

NDP

Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

No, I heard you. I'm a little surprised, because the whole point of the program is to increase the savings rate of Canadians. This is not a complicated analysis to do. We can look at the savings rate.

The PBO has testified in front of this committee that the savings rate of Canadians has not changed since the introduction of the TFSA. People are simply choosing vehicles, switching money from one savings vehicle to another one, but the overall rate has not changed. This is not a complex analysis. I'm surprised that, if it was the intention of the program, the department wouldn't have assessed that impact.

10:20 a.m.

Director, Personal Income Tax, Tax Policy Branch, Department of Finance

Miodrag Jovanovic

The economic literature on savings rates is quite complex. If you look at the literature and you look at many, many studies that have tried to assess the determinant of saving and have even tried to determine the definition of a proper savings rate, doing that is extremely complex.

What we know is the government has created a vehicle that is very attractive to Canadians of all income classes and all ages.

10:20 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative James Rajotte

Thank you, Mr. Cullen.

Mr. Dubourg, you have the floor for five minutes.

May 26th, 2015 / 10:20 a.m.

Liberal

Emmanuel Dubourg Liberal Bourassa, QC

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

I would like to take this opportunity to greet all my parliamentary colleagues and our guests.

I will briefly continue with the TFSA topic that my colleague addressed.

We often hear in the House that the families making $60,000 have made a maximum contribution to a TFSA. Do you have any information on that and can you tell us how it is possible to state that families making $60,000 contributed a maximum amount to a TFSA?

10:25 a.m.

Director, Personal Income Tax, Tax Policy Branch, Department of Finance

Miodrag Jovanovic

We have data on people who contribute the maximum amount. About 20% of people contribute the maximum amount to a TFSA. Of that number, which represents approximately 1.9 million people, we see that 60% have an income under $60,000 a year.

10:25 a.m.

Liberal

Emmanuel Dubourg Liberal Bourassa, QC

You are saying that 60% have an income under $60,000. However, is it true that, before the inception of the TFSA, those people perhaps had a number of years' worth of savings and, once the TFSA was set up, they all seized the opportunity if they had $6,000, $7,000, $8,000 or $10,000 in their bank accounts?

Right now, can we expect families making $60,000 to still contribute the maximum amount, which is $10,000?

10:25 a.m.

Director, Personal Income Tax, Tax Policy Branch, Department of Finance

Miodrag Jovanovic

The money used for a TFSA can come from various sources of savings or from income earned during the year.

10:25 a.m.

Liberal

Emmanuel Dubourg Liberal Bourassa, QC

Okay, but I would like to point something out.

People who have a gross income of $60,000 also do their income taxes. After paying their taxes, how many people can have $10,000 in savings for a TFSA?