No, because.... That's where I'm saying the success....
What we're talking about when we're talking about that measure is that it was a development expense. It wasn't an exploration expense. It's only by sort of being designated as exploration.... It's basically put into the class. Let's put it that way. These development expenses that would normally be called Canadian development expenses at 30% are deemed essentially to be Canadian exploration expenses, which are deductible at 100%.
That's why they are able to deduct them at 100%: it's because we deem it. It's not whether it was successful or not; it was a development expense that we deemed to be an exploration expense deductible at 100%. That's what's being impacted. That's why I'm saying it's not really whether it's a success or not on that issue.