Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I'd like to pick up on the idea of going after more detailed information that reveals trends and patterns, instead of focusing on the specific dollar limit that triggers reporting, in other words, $10,000. The vast majority of those transactions are completely kosher, as we know. What the committee must do, then, is try to figure out how the system can flag situations that are potentially troubling, such as recurring transactions between two entities during a given period of time or repeated transactions of $9,900.
At the end of the day, shouldn't the objective be to have a system that flags situations that truly pose a threat, as opposed to setting a specific limit?