We talked about and worried about that kind of strategy in the committee that I co-chair. The people I'm working with are people working directly in investigations, enforcement, and similar activities at the law society. They're not the politicians; they are the people who are doing that work. I have not heard of any specific examples, but I will say that, while this only deals with cash, our no-cash rule picked up some exceptions that come out of the federal regulations—although, of course, that's about suspicious transactions and large-cash reporting. I can't recall whether this is right out of the regulations or whether it simply seemed like a good idea back in 2004, but the no-cash rule includes an exception for money that is paid as a result of a court order, which could include exactly what you're talking about.
We've said that we don't think it's an exception that we should maintain. We think it should come out of the rule. Again, that's only dealing with cash, but we looked at it and said it's a clunky way to launder money, but if you're a major corporation with a major contract with very high stakes, for example, it could nonetheless be an effective way to deal with large quantities of money, and we've taken that out.
Beyond that, I can't say that I have anything more specific to offer.