Thank you, Mr. Dusseault. That's an excellent question.
In the regulatory world, a lawyer can commit an infraction of the rules intentionally, and that would be something that would be not only professional misconduct but likely also criminal misconduct. If somebody were knowingly engaged in money laundering, for example, they should be caught by law society enforcement, but they would also be caught by the larger criminal systems that we have.
Lawyers can also be targeted for breaching rules because they're acting negligently or without oversight. They don't necessarily have to intentionally mean to participate in money laundering if their practices and structures are sloppy or careless. If it's an oversight, that can be a breach, and lawyers can be disciplined for breaching the law society code. A good example is client identification. Sometimes lawyers get busy. They may not properly identify their clients. They don't intend to break that rule, but those types of failures should be caught through a law society auditing process, and the lawyer can be disciplined for that even though they didn't intend to breach it. The negligent performance or the lack of attention to detail doesn't need to be intentional.
That is the strength of having a number of different layers. The law society can act not only on intentional wrongdoing but also on negligent wrongdoing, and even on wrongdoing that occurs simply because you believe you're doing the right thing but you don't comply with the rules for whatever reason. That could still be a breach. It may be a defence, in terms of how you deal with a complaint or prosecution, that you've tried to do your very best, but it can certainly be a breach.
I don't know, Ms. Wilson, if you want to add anything.