It does vary. The difficulty we have is we do hear anecdotes and stories, and I'll give you one example. We recently heard of a situation in which a B.C. member was examined and cited by FINTRAC. We don't know the full details. We talked to the member, and they were cited for writing “Vancouver, B.C.” on their identification form as opposed to “Vancouver, British Columbia”. That kind of nitpicky distraction frustrates our members and sometimes takes people's eye off the ball of what is actually supposed to be accomplished here, which is detecting money laundering. That's an anecdotal observation.
The difficulty is that we don't have any aggregate statistics from FINTRAC about where our members are having difficulties, and that's the kind of information we could use. We've asked them many times for it.