Mr. Chair, I just wanted to quickly ask a couple of questions for clarity, the first to the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives.
In your presentation you refer to first nations, Métis and Inuit, but then in your recommendation you only refer to “on reserve”. The Métis don't have reserves. The Inuit don't have reserves. In the Northwest Territories we don't have reserves. We have public communities, but we do have the highest core need for housing in the country.
Can you clarify whether that was intentional or unintentional? If it was intentional, does it include the north? If it does, how?