I do still have a point of order.
I was just needing to get some clarity as to where things were before I could move forward with my point.
My understanding of that is that you gave us an indication of the original motion, there was an amendment that Mr. Fergus had made and then the lengthy subamendment that Mr. Kmiec put forward. Is that where we are?
We would be at debate on the subamendment if we were to continue. Is that correct?