That's not quite how I read this. It says “a minimum of 26 hours”...“the individual is employed”, and sometimes that individual is not employed. The owners, and they're also operators, may hire a few freelancers, so those freelancers would then meet the requirements of this, but the owners themselves wouldn't.
Then on the other part of the definition, it talks about “in the case of a corporation”. It says, “the chairperson or other presiding officer, and at least 3/4 of the directors or other similar officers, are citizens of Canada”.
In the case of some of these weeklies, they don't have that. They have an owner who is doing it. I understand that some measures are for not-for-profits, so the only way they can apply to them is if they convert their corporation to a not-for-profit. Then why are you the owner-operator of a not-for-profit? It changes their business model, quite frankly. Is that the intention of this, also, to change the business model of weeklies in the smaller communities?