Thank you.
Can you provide some clarification? I think we've been skirting around this in a number of ways. Mr. McLeod talked about the infrastructure in the north and you talked about the lack of incremental progress. As I'm understanding from your report, the programs by which the federal government puts infrastructure money out are supported by provincial and municipal governments as partners, usually with a third, a third and a third, but there are variations on that theme.
Further, my understanding is that in provinces—as an example, Ontario, where the provincial government has not released their infrastructure programs—the federal money is not being leveraged to the degree it could be and indeed should be in order to realize those incremental increases in infrastructure growth. Is that fair?