One more question....
Evidence of meeting #33 for Finance in the 42nd Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was alberta.
A video is available from Parliament.
Evidence of meeting #33 for Finance in the 42nd Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was alberta.
A video is available from Parliament.
Conservative
Ziad Aboultaif Conservative Edmonton Manning, AB
For me? Sure, I'll take it.
Do you have measures for productivity? How is it measured compared to, let's say, the United States?
Is it 40% lower or 26% lower? What is it?
September 20th, 2016 / 6:20 p.m.
Deputy Minister – President , Economic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of Quebec
We know it is lower than Ontario, generally.
Deputy Minister – President , Economic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of Quebec
I am comparing Quebec to Ontario.
Deputy Minister – President , Economic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of Quebec
Our productivity is lower by a few percentage points.
Conservative
Deputy Minister – President , Economic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of Quebec
Yes.
Deputy Minister – President , Economic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of Quebec
I think it is 3% or 4%. We can check.
Conservative
Ziad Aboultaif Conservative Edmonton Manning, AB
Do you have any idea how much it is compared to other nations, for example the United States?
Deputy Minister – President , Economic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of Quebec
I don't—
Vice-President, Operations, Economic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of Quebec
Sorry, we don't have all these statistics, but—
Deputy Minister – President , Economic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of Quebec
What I do have is that we are behind. I can't tell you by how much, but Quebec is behind Ontario, Canada generally, the States, and most OECD countries. We have the big picture.
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Wayne Easter
Thank you. Just on that point, do you measure the results of your investments with small business, with enterprises?
Deputy Minister – President , Economic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of Quebec
I referred earlier to a Statistics Canada study that we asked them to do for us. They look over a long period of time to see whether the SMEs we are helping are still alive, how long they stay alive, whether they have higher salaries—and they do—and whether they have higher productivity—and they do.
That is how we measure, by comparing it to un groupe témoin and making sure that we actually make a difference.
Liberal
Liberal
Steven MacKinnon Liberal Gatineau, QC
Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I will change the direction of the questions a bit.
As you know, the Government of Quebec has changed its approach to local development. It decided to close some CLDs, a change that is under way. How is this affecting the agency and your day-to-day activities?
Deputy Minister – President , Economic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of Quebec
The CLDs also work quite a lot with our CFDCs. We addressed the matter earlier. We are working closely, particularly with the ministry of the economy, science and innovation, the MESI, which is the main economic ministry, with its financial arm represented by Investissement Québec. Investissement Québec is a partner in almost a quarter of our projects. In short, work is being done in collaboration. Quebec changed its way of operating. We have adapted, and we are still working very well with the Government of Quebec, its ministries and organizations, namely, its “supply arms”, if I can put it like that.
Liberal
Steven MacKinnon Liberal Gatineau, QC
In Quebec, there are an impressive number of partners in the financing of a given project. Shouldn't this be simplified?
From the perspective of an entrepreneur or a project developer, the number of partners able to participate in a project is quite impressive. We often need to reach these people and bring them together around the same table. I've seen impressive examples where this has happened very effectively.
I'd like your views on this. Shouldn't we simplify the process and reduce the number of partners around the same table by overlooking the level of government?
Deputy Minister – President , Economic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of Quebec
To do that, we would need to find someone with all the mandates and competencies, which is a challenge in itself. That person would also have to be able to meet all the demands.
We are working with various types of entrepreneurs and businesses. The small businesses that deal mainly with the CFDCs could find it difficult to work with a partner the size of an organization like Investissement Québec, the BDC or other organizations like that.
There are many stakeholders, of course, but each entrepreneur needs to be associated with a certain niche. We can make groups fairly easily. Is it possible to work better and more effectively together? No doubt, which is what we are trying to do. However, will simplification really lead to an ultimate one-stop shop?
Liberal
Steven MacKinnon Liberal Gatineau, QC
Other regions have a concierge service. Does this concept exist in Quebec?
Deputy Minister – President , Economic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of Quebec
Yes, in the accelerated growth program CED wants to position itself to connect entrepreneurs with the right stakeholders for their case. It's important to understand that not every stakeholder is right for every case. The entrepreneurs appreciate this service.
CED also makes life easier for entrepreneurs who might have projects in three regions, for example. In that case, we advise them to work with an office and let CED manage the housekeeping and take care of the other two offices. So we are going to help with that kind of thing.
Liberal
Steven MacKinnon Liberal Gatineau, QC
Thank you.
Let's change the subject now.
As you know, we are going to invest a lot of money in public transit and infrastructure in the next few years. You mentioned that the hot topic in Quebec right now is electrification of transportation.
How do you think Quebec will be able to benefit from this strong trend from the Government of Quebec and the investments in infrastructure by the federal government that will obviously be paired with those of other levels of government? Basically, how do you see the future and how will Quebec be able to benefit from these investments at all levels?