Agreed, because the more competition the better, frankly, in the United States where they might select our products over other imports that they get. But again, it adds another perhaps wet blanket to the prediction that things might get better down the road, because the extended agreement is quickly coming to an end, and by all appearances we're not going to have a new softwood lumber deal, which means the United States will be closing the gates to those exports, which are probably important to many of your communities and many of your workers in Alberta as well.
That being said, let me move on to the importance of transporting the other major product that you produce, oil and gas, and the statements about pipelines to tidewaters. What puzzles me from time to time—and I'd just like your thoughts on this—is that when you see the predictions of an increase in production, that means it will have to be transported somehow. You also mentioned during your remarks the expansion of rail transportation to accommodate that growth. Am I correct that you were saying it's going to go somehow, and if it doesn't go by pipeline it's going to go by rail?