We're talking about improving the clarity, linking it to outputs, and basically the objectives of those numbers. One thing is that usually when we have those estimates, we come, if we're lucky, to a committee like this and we look at the numbers for two hours. Now, we might have one page of numbers, usually in supplementaries A, B, or C, or we can have three, four, five, or six pages that are actually very difficult to understand because they are usually one line. This is why we have the ministers, so we can actually ask what those lines mean. Not only that, but usually it's not very well detailed. You can have many hundred millions under one line that is very vague in its meaning.
How can we actually have a meaningful estimate process even if we are clarifying or standardizing the process when we don't have enough time to do it? How much time should we have to do a proper scrutiny of those numbers?