On the CCS front, Boundary Dam was the model in response to the federal legislation that was passed, which basically said that thermal coal power stations of a certain age had to be shut down unless they went to CCS.
Possibly supporting funding for additional CCS power stations to leverage the existing technology would be one area that could then be.... And assistance in exporting the existing technology, quite frankly, would also maybe tie into the trade missions.
On the nuclear front, we provide 22% of the world's uranium. Supporting the advancement of nuclear power throughout Canada, and also the world via the trade missions, would be helpful.
Also useful would be moving towards really looking at small modular reactors that could be used in remote areas throughout Canada, and even at mine sites, to help achieve reductions in diesel energy and things like that. They have started to look at doing this in Japan now, and in the United States. We know that regulatory approval for that would probably take seven years, but it's a new and emerging technology that would definitely address greenhouse gases.
I think there has to be a lot of thought about what's going to happen to northern Canada with climate change. There are not a lot of options out there. You can't just run natural gas to the north, so what is the power infrastructure going to be like when you have eight months of winter and no solar and no reliable wind? What are the options going to be?
I think that maybe some thought could happen around those two fronts.