Well, they have spent about $750,000 so far doing a lot of upfront work. This facility is going to be built somewhere in the world. Right now in Canada, you cannot develop the Arctic unless you can prove that you can respond to an oil spill on ice, and you're—correctly—not allowed to spill oil on ice, so you can't prove that you can respond. You can't test technology.
The state of the art right now for detecting oil under ice or under snow is dogs, which can do it from a mile away. We have technologies, but we just don't know how well they work. We're not able to train people to respond to oil spills on ice, yet traffic is continuing to increase in the Northwest Passage. There's a 40% reduction in vessel time to go through the Northwest Passage versus going through the Panama Canal or the Suez Canal, and a reduction of 1,300 metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions by going through the Northwest Passage, so it's a good way to go, but Transport Canada's own study, the Government of Canada's own study, said we are not prepared to respond to an oil spill there, even though there's all this increase in traffic.