The needs are so great in social housing right now, as I said in my remarks—in rehabilitation and renewal of existing stock, the need for new incremental units, the need to look at some socially innovative ways to get out of operating agreements once they expire—that at this point, most housing providers in Canada would be happy taking “any of the above” by way of funding. Whether it were dedicated in one of those areas or were a more global fund, I don't think there would be any opposition to it. But if there were strings attached, in one of those specific areas identified, there has been no housing provider whom I've talked to who has any concerns with that.
On February 18th, 2016. See this statement in context.