I think the difference.... What used to happen in Alberta, and many of the MPs are aware because they had constituents on a fly-in-fly-out basis, is that the $100 a barrel oil paid for that. The problem in this particular case is that if there is no tax break, it's just going to be built onto the cost of the infrastructure project, which is going to come out of the federal government anyway, so it might as well come from the tax system, and I think return significant value.
It's something you should push hard on. I would encourage my colleagues across the way, who have a lot more input into the budget than we do on this side. I'd like to see that kind of tax break, which has great returns, looked at significantly.
I'd like to ask a quick question of Ms. Durdin from the credit union. Along the same lines, I'd like a little more of an explanation on your point three because I don't quite understand the current situation.
What's going to happen if this expires? Could you elaborate on that a little more? Give me an on-the-ground example of a benefit that you're proposing.