In fact, we see no inconsistency in this. For us, with the inflation target being our goal, we need to achieve a position whereby we've achieved a 2% inflation that is sustainably at 2%. Being sustainably at 2% would mean that there is no excess demand or excess supply in the economy pulling it down or pushing it up, so there is in effect a coincidence: that we would also be at maximum employment at that same time.
For us, then, the two are not distinguishable, but I think that having purely an inflation target improves the clarity of the decision-making we have, because of course in the background the economy is working through its adjustment processes. It's very difficult to have two targets with really only one instrument doing that.