Just to be clear, the earlier question posed was that if something bad happened in the Canadian economy, what tools would we use to try to create more employment. The question you're framing, I think, is a little different, so I'll answer it differently.
I think what you want to look for are things that we call the “third leg” of the policy suite, namely, structural policies. These are policies that are, in effect, intended to enhance the ability of the economy to grow, usually by removing impediments to growth rather than somehow trying to boost them.
A good example would be CETA, and another one would be CFTA. These are explicitly designed to remove impediments to business growth and job creation. As is often the case with structural policies, they are literally free money. It's not as if it costs money to do these things. It's changing rules or adapting programs that already exist so they're more effective.
What happens then is, let's say you do something that enhances the labour force participation of women. That increases the labour input for the economy and the potential output of the economy, giving us more room to grow. That would be a structural policy, not fiscal per se, and certainly not monetary policy.
It can work in much the same way as a free trade agreement works to enhance the ability of the economy to grow on its own. There is no end of examples that one could come up with.