Thank you, Mr. Chair.
That was going to be one point, so if that's changed, I have no problem supporting that as well.
I'll deal with the last recommendation because I think it's easiest. It refers to part 4, division 18, and it's regarding the infrastructure bank, which is a finance program. I have concerns about asking the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities for this one, when it's been this committee that's talked about the infrastructure bank. I understand the rationale behind getting further input from the committees that might oversee these topics generally, but this one is a finance issue.
I'll just say that, and if Ron or anyone else has comments, I'd be happy to hear them.
The only other one is point (ii), which refers part 4, division 13, to the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration. I read that section, which is quite small, and it's just dealing with visas. I'm wondering what the rationale is to get that additional feedback, because it wasn't very comprehensive in terms of a policy.
Perhaps you could provide some more rationale for at least those two, although I certainly don't have an issue in principle with what you're asking.