If we only have an opportunity to have a small discussion here and then in the House of Commons before it moves on to the other place. I'm afraid we are going to end up with something that will not serve Canadians and will probably not be revisited.
Your predecessor spoke about the need to have a review. I imagine even your team would say that sometimes having a review of the reviewers can be a good thing. I'll put it in different terms. Do you believe that an alternative process whereby parliamentarians can sit back and look at the history of your institution, but also look at the future of its becoming an office of Parliament, and then make sure that you're truly independent...? Do you think there could be a better process than the one we are currently in?