Perhaps we can consider tolls as revenue generators. If money invested by the government, which comes from taxpayers, covers the cost of building infrastructure, and taxpayers are then also asked to pay to use the infrastructure, I think there's a major problem. The public funds the infrastructure, and continues to pay to use it later.
Another issue, which hasn't been clarified yet by the Minister of Finance, concerns the final decision on infrastructure projects. Sometimes, we hear that the minister or cabinet will make the final decision on whether a project will move forward. However, some say that the Infrastructure Bank is autonomous and completely independent, and that the government has no say in the decisions. Can you clarify who will make the final decision to accept or reject an infrastructure project?