In this case, then, the amendment is not valid, because it is already covered by the limits of a public office holder. Is that correct?
On May 29th, 2017. See this statement in context.
On May 29th, 2017. See this statement in context.
Conservative
Dan Albas Conservative Central Okanagan—Similkameen—Nicola, BC
In this case, then, the amendment is not valid, because it is already covered by the limits of a public office holder. Is that correct?
See context to find out what was said next.