In this case, then, the amendment is not valid, because it is already covered by the limits of a public office holder. Is that correct?
On May 29th, 2017. See this statement in context.
On May 29th, 2017. See this statement in context.
May 29th, 2017 / 6:50 p.m.
Conservative
Dan Albas Conservative Central Okanagan—Similkameen—Nicola, BC
In this case, then, the amendment is not valid, because it is already covered by the limits of a public office holder. Is that correct?
See context to find out what was said next.