Sure.
I will direct my next question to our guest from the Winnipeg chamber.
You've described the government's efforts as hitting the mark nine times out of 10. I think the only reason for that is that we've been taking advice, as you've pointed out, from groups that have real experience in the economy or the communities, that can say, “Hey this is going to work,” or, “This needs to be tweaked.” Thank you for your input to date.
I've been doing some of my own consultations in my own community as a local member of Parliament, and doing some with some of my colleagues across Canada. I've found it remarkable to see how quickly we can identify where policy does need to be tweaked to make changes when we're having conversations of this nature, particularly when virtually everyone in Canada is focused on a common threat. I'm curious as to whether you can see lessons we can take from the consultation process—if I can call it that—as we formulate policy, to continue to have it be effective on a go-forward basis when we start to pivot towards the recovery.
How can we best engage with stakeholders to continue the success we've seen—to use your words—to hit the target nine times out of 10 during the next phase of this response?