I guess what I'm finding really surprising here is that we have a proposal, and it's not the one that the government needs. Then another proposal is written that's much closer. There had to be negotiations back and forth with WE in order to make this thing credible—or was this just done on the back of a napkin?
Was there work done so that this second proposal met the requirements, so that you could then say, this is as close as we can get; this is a group that can do it?
Who was that point person?