If you could withdraw the motion, then, and bring it forward at a later date, I was going to suggest....
I mean, I don't want to rule it out of order—at least, not as yet—but I do think that the implications of the way the motion is currently worded are very broad. It may get into some privacy issues. It may put a chill on witnesses wanting to come before committee if we retroactively ask them to provide any of the correspondence, etc. I'd like to see it in writing, and maybe run it by the law clerk, for that matter, to make sure we're on fair ground, if I can put it that way.
Are you pulling it back, Mr. Poilievre, and we'll think about it and bring it forward with maybe a little more clarity to it? Is that what I'm hearing?