Sir, it's inaccurate statements like this that are truly killing a Canadian charity, and I don't mean this to be dramatic in my statement. WE Charity is being raked over the coals by inaccurate statements like yours. No companies were party to this contract; only registered charities were party to the contract.
To answer your question, the contribution agreement outlined the eligible expenses exactly. We were not making this up on the side of a napkin. The Government of Canada, in the contribution agreement, outlined the eligible expenses.
But sir, with great respect, you do know this. People like members of Parliament don't reach this stage in their careers without understanding what we've explained hour after hour here. It's this blatant disregard for the facts that are being put out here, comments around companies and comments around money moving at inappropriate levels.... Frankly, by continuing this you're harming a Canadian charity, and you're harming young people in this country in the process.