Monsieur Tassé, if I may, I think there are two distinct issues at play. I apologize for interrupting, but I think you were actually giving the answer to my second question, which I haven't asked yet.
The first question touches on the relationship between the various legal entities as a strategy to manage risk. Different members of the opposition have tried to make hay out of the fact that there was some confusing arrangement among various structures, such as the ME to WE social enterprise, the WE Charity, and the WE Charity Foundation.
The question I posed to you was simply whether there would be a problem, from your perspective, in using the WE Charity Foundation as an entity that was specifically created to limit the liability of the WE Charity for administering the program. This is not a question about due diligence that should have taken place—which is the subject of my next question, if I get there—but simply whether the structure of using the WE Charity Foundation was inappropriate, from your perspective, given that the civil service's recommendation was informed with that full information.