First, generally, on the agreement that Peter has proposed, I think we can work with that.
On Pierre's motion, I'd be opposed to adopting it. There are a number of reasons. A lot of the information that has been asked for is actually publicly available already. I do think there would be some sensitivities potentially about details of any commercial arrangements involving the bank itself.
If committee members, when we return, want to invite the bank back to ask what questions they may have of this nature, I'm not confident that the motion, as it's been put, would not interfere with the ability of the bank to do its work.
For that reason, I'd be inclined to vote against the motion, but I'm happy to discuss what options for the pre-budget consultations other members may want to entertain.