Also, if we had not given it, then no one would ever have noticed whether it existed or not.
I want to go back a little. We started with the July 7 motion, which requested a certain number of documents. Then you indicated to us that our civil servants decided that they were going to additionally exclude certain bits of information as per the Access to Information Act, and you listed those very well in your comments, noting that they are the personal information, the third party, the solicitor-client privilege grounds, etc.
I want to be clear. Have you seen any evidence that there was any political interference in applying the Access to Information Act, or was this done just by the civil servants?