Let me ask my question more simply.
Of course, the committee can decide to impose limits on itself, as you very rightly said. However, if the committee asks for information without setting limits, but someone decides to go beyond the committee's order and redact the documents, it is possible that the person will be redacting information that might be relevant to the study in question, in this case, the study on WE Charity. It is up to the committee to decide what is and is not relevant for its study, correct?