It's up to the committee to interpret its motions. What I could point to is that if something is not part of the request from the committee initially in July—if it's not relevant to the July motion—it's arguable that it would not [Inaudible—Editor].
Law Clerk and Parliamentary Counsel, House of Commons
It's up to the committee to interpret its motions. What I could point to is that if something is not part of the request from the committee initially in July—if it's not relevant to the July motion—it's arguable that it would not [Inaudible—Editor].
See context to find out what was said next.