On the other areas you've mentioned, where there were some redactions that were made in areas such as solicitor and client privilege, Mr. Fragiskatos asked if you believed that ground was essential and you agreed. One of the things I'll point to in the July 7 motion is that the motion suggests....
I will acknowledge that the motion says it should have been your office that made the redactions, as opposed to the government, but it does say “any redactions necessary”.
One of the things I am curious about is this. Given the fact that you believe solicitor and client privilege—as you agreed with Mr. Fragiskatos—is essential, would redacting that information, in fact, be necessary?