Thank you for that.
You said that the government consulted with stakeholders. Did the options that were laid out to stakeholders include the possibility of making these provisions retroactive, given that the government from the very beginning, including the former finance minister, was very clear that this wage subsidy should not apply to dividends and to executive bonuses?
Other countries, of course, put all those provisions in place, so the abuses we're seeing are strictly in Canada. Given that the government said repeatedly that it can't be used for these purposes, to what extent was the government consulting on making the actual components, the tools, to claw back that money retroactive?