I think there are probably two different areas.
One, which I spoke to, was the ability to provide more objective information through CMHC on zoning issues and on some of the better practices that can be used to help accelerate getting more market-rate supply into the market at the municipal level.
As well, Nimbyism is such a huge factor for building anything pretty much anywhere these days. In fact, the only times you don't see that phenomenon is when you build greenfield development. Ironically, we're all trying to build smartly upwards and inwards as well, through densification. That's the hardest thing to get done, so some work there would be really important.
The other real levers that the federal government also has are funding mechanisms. The government is committing to more infrastructure funding, for example, and tying it to good housing outcomes could be really important to make sure we get the desired type of density around transit stations and including market-rate housing in it. There's obviously a focus on social housing and supportive housing, which is really important, but we also need to look at how we also support market-rate housing, and the levers that the government has through such things as infrastructure can really help that.