Evidence of meeting #53 for Finance in the 43rd Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was chair.

A video is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Kristen Underwood  Director General, Income Security and Social Development Branch, Department of Employment and Social Development
Kevin Wagdin  Director, Seniors and Pensions Policy Secretariat, Income Security and Social Development Branch, Department of Employment and Social Development
Philippe Méla  Legislative Clerk
Selena Beattie  Executive Director, People Management and Community Engagement, Workplace Policies and Services Sector, Treasury Board Secretariat
Karen Hall  Director General, Social Policy Directorate, Strategic and Service Policy Branch, Department of Employment and Social Development
Catherine Demers  Director General, Employment Insurance Policy, Skills and Employment Branch, Department of Employment and Social Development
Clerk of the Committee  Mr. Alexandre Roger
Barbara Moran  Director General, Strategic Policy, Analysis and Workplace Information, Labour Program - Policy, Dispute Resolution and International Affairs Directorate, Department of Employment and Social Development
Mona Nandy  Executive Director, Employment Insurance Policy, Skills and Employment Branch, Department of Employment and Social Development
George Rae  Director, Policy Analysis and Initiative, Employment Insurance Policy, Skills and Employment Branch, Department of Employment and Social Development
Manon Paquet  Director, Special Projects, Democratic Institutions Secretariat, Privy Council Office

5:25 p.m.

Liberal

Julie Dzerowicz Liberal Davenport, ON

Thank you so much, Mr. Chair.

I want to thank Ms. Paquet for the explanation.

Could you tell us a bit more about the ruling from the Ontario Superior Court of Justice?

5:25 p.m.

Director, Special Projects, Democratic Institutions Secretariat, Privy Council Office

Manon Paquet

Sure. Thank you for the question.

The court decision was about the constitutionality of section 91. Even though there was an intent within the provision itself, imparting the intent to affect the outcome of elections, the court ruled that the knowledge requirement to know that the statement was false was not clear within the provision. The amendment would explicitly include that knowledge requirement.

5:25 p.m.

Liberal

Julie Dzerowicz Liberal Davenport, ON

Thank you. I have a follow-up, if it's okay, Mr. Chair.

Ms. Paquet, can you kindly refresh my memory on section 91?

5:25 p.m.

Director, Special Projects, Democratic Institutions Secretariat, Privy Council Office

Manon Paquet

Of course.

Section 91 prohibits specific types of false statements regarding candidates, prospective candidates, the leader of a political party or a public figure associated with a political party. It only applies during the election period. It's for a statement, for example, that one of those persons would have done something illegal, or a statement regarding citizenship, place of birth, education or professional qualifications, so factually verifiable information.

5:25 p.m.

Liberal

Julie Dzerowicz Liberal Davenport, ON

Thank you.

Can I have one more small question, a definition one?

5:25 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Wayne Easter

You can have one more small question, and then we'll go to Mr. Kelly.

Go ahead.

5:25 p.m.

Liberal

Julie Dzerowicz Liberal Davenport, ON

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Could you just define for us what “knowledge requirement” means?

5:25 p.m.

Director, Special Projects, Democratic Institutions Secretariat, Privy Council Office

Manon Paquet

It would clarify that the individual making the statement needed to know that the statement was false.

5:30 p.m.

Liberal

Julie Dzerowicz Liberal Davenport, ON

Thank you.

5:30 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Wayne Easter

Does your explanation also relate to clause 363 so that we can deal with these two together?

5:30 p.m.

Director, Special Projects, Democratic Institutions Secretariat, Privy Council Office

Manon Paquet

Clause 363 is about the coming into force. It comes into force with royal assent.

5:30 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Wayne Easter

All right.

Mr. Kelly.

5:30 p.m.

Conservative

Pat Kelly Conservative Calgary Rocky Ridge, AB

Mr. Chair, I quickly want to flag that there will not be consent to extend the meeting.

We're down to literally the last bit here. If we're not able to vote on these clauses by 5:30, we'd be prepared to adjourn the meeting so that other committees can meet.

5:30 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Wayne Easter

I'll have to find my notice, Pat, but the notice of meeting goes until eight o'clock, so it's not a question of—

5:30 p.m.

Conservative

Pat Kelly Conservative Calgary Rocky Ridge, AB

Was there agreement to extend that?

5:30 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Wayne Easter

We sent the notice out.

5:30 p.m.

Conservative

Pat Kelly Conservative Calgary Rocky Ridge, AB

Okay, I guess I'm just encouraging...since we are down to the last bits here.

5:30 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Wayne Easter

The problem is that lately the rules for the people doing translation say that we have to give them 30 minutes.

There was an agreement, as I understood—maybe there's something I don't know—among the whips that we would go until eight o'clock tonight and that there would be a 30-minute suspension right now. The notice of meeting went out for meeting number 53 to be from 3:30 until 8:00.

I can't do anything about it. I'm sorry, but I can't impose on the agreements with the translators. I just can't.

5:30 p.m.

Conservative

Tamara Jansen Conservative Cloverdale—Langley City, BC

Mr. Chair, I have a question.

5:30 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Wayne Easter

Go ahead, Ms. Jansen.

I'm sorry. I would love to finish, but I just can't.

5:30 p.m.

Conservative

Tamara Jansen Conservative Cloverdale—Langley City, BC

Do you have a guesstimate of how much time it will take us to finish?

5:30 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Wayne Easter

I don't know how long it will take on Elizabeth May's amendment, but I expect it will take us 15 or 20 minutes.

The translators are operating under an agreement that they have to have a 30-minute break right now. We ran into that the other night. I will have to suspend for 30 minutes and reconvene. I'm sorry about that, but there's just nothing I can do about it, in all honesty.

The meeting is suspended until 6:02 Ottawa time.

6 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Wayne Easter

We'll call the meeting to order once again.

We did have a discussion on clauses 362 and 363. Are there any questions on those discussions? I see none.

(Clauses 362 and 363 agreed to on division)

Shall schedule 1 carry? I see Mr. Fraser—

6 p.m.

Liberal

Annie Koutrakis Liberal Vimy, QC

I have a point of order, Mr. Chair.

6 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Wayne Easter

Your amendment is on schedule 3, I believe, Elizabeth May, but I have Sean Fraser first, and then I have you, Ms. May.

Sean.