Indeed, there's a good, effective dialogue on policy and enforcement matters that we engage in routinely with our Competition Bureau colleagues. On these issues, we have had engagements and discussions, and it comes down to a very similar issue that we raised earlier. It's about where the appropriate balance point is between the ease of enforcement versus the compliance burden or the impacts to business. In this case, our view is simply that it was important to raise to the committee's attention that this could have potential effects in terms of the impact on fairness, as Mr. Simard pointed out earlier, and in terms of the equity with which all the proposed mergers would be treated.
Then, also, there is the issue whereby a merger could, in fact, be proposed, withdrawn and then reproposed, with a slightly different formulation that would allow it to slip underneath. That's the reason we wanted to raised these for consideration.